Cyclomatic complexity - Wikipedia. Cyclomatic Complexity is a software metric (measurement), used to indicate the complexity of a program. It is a quantitative measure of the number of linearly independent paths through a program's source code. It was developed by Thomas J. Cyclomatic complexity may also be applied to individual functions, modules, methods or classes within a program.
One testing strategy, called basis path testing by Mc. Cabe who first proposed it, is to test each linearly independent path through the program; in this case, the number of test cases will equal the cyclomatic complexity of the program. The program begins executing at the red node, then enters a loop (group of three nodes immediately below the red node). Department of Computer Science 602 ICT Building University of Calgary 2500 University Dr NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada T. Programs and Concentrations The Department of Computer Science offers three programs (and seven. Computer scientists study the theory, design, implementation, and performance of computers and computer software, including the study of computability and computation itself. At the undergraduate level we offer the Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Arts. Home Telehealth For Veterans who have a health problem like diabetes, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression or post-traumatic stress disorder, getting treatment can be complex and inconvenient. For some, especially. IBM government solutions provide law enforcement, emergency management, and defense organizations with innovative and advanced analysis tools to generate actionable intelligence which helps to detect, disrupt and prevent physical and cyber threats. On exiting the loop, there is a conditional statement (group below the loop), and finally the program exits at the blue node. This graph has 9 edges, 8 nodes, and 1 connected component, so the cyclomatic complexity of the program is 9 - 8 + 2*1 = 3. The cyclomatic complexity of a section of source code is the number of linearly independent paths within it. For instance, if the source code contained no control flow statements (conditionals or decision points), the complexity would be 1, since there would be only a single path through the code. If the code had one single- condition IF statement, there would be two paths through the code: one where the IF statement evaluates to TRUE and another one where it evaluates to FALSE, so the complexity would be 2. Two nested single- condition IFs, or one IF with two conditions, would produce a complexity of 4. Mathematically, the cyclomatic complexity of a structured program. The complexity M is then defined as. This graph has 1. An alternative formulation is to use a graph in which each exit point is connected back to the entry point. In this case, the graph is strongly connected, and the cyclomatic complexity of the program is equal to the cyclomatic number of its graph (also known as the first Betti number), which is defined as. Note that because each exit point loops back to the entry point, there is at least one such cycle for each exit point. For a single program (or subroutine or method), P is always equal to 1. So a simpler formula for a single subroutine is. M = E . However, this is true only for decision points counted at the lowest, machine- level instructions. Decisions involving compound predicates like those found in high- level languages like IF cond. AND cond. 2 THEN .. In the following, even subgraphs will be identified with their edge sets, which is equivalent to only considering those even subgraphs which contain all vertices of the full graph. The set of all even subgraphs of a graph is closed under symmetric difference, and may thus be viewed as a vector space over GF(2); this vector space is called the cycle space of the graph. Welcome to the web site for the NSF-REU Program in Mathematics at Boise State University COMPLEXITY ACROSS DISCIPLINES (CAD) The program is a nine week summer program in which. Want to watch this again later? Sign in to add this video to a playlist. See complete series on time complexity here http:// What is time complexity of an algorithm and why is it important? Tutorial Level: Beginner Prerequisite. The cyclomatic number of the graph is defined as the dimension of this space. Since GF(2) has two elements and the cycle space is necessarily finite, the cyclomatic number is also equal to the 2- logarithm of the number of elements in the cycle space. A basis for the cycle space is easily constructed by first fixing a maximal spanning forest of the graph, and then considering the cycles formed by one edge not in the forest and the path in the forest connecting the endpoints of that edge; these cycles constitute a basis for the cycle space. Hence, the cyclomatic number also equals the number of edges not in a maximal spanning forest of a graph. Since the number of edges in a maximal spanning forest of a graph is equal to the number of vertices minus the number of components, the formula E. This is a technical way of saying . If one considers the control flow graph as a 1- dimensional CW complex called X. The fundamental group counts how many loops there are through the graph, up to homotopy, and hence aligns with what we would intuitively expect. This corresponds to the characterization of cyclomatic complexity as . As the methodology acknowledged that there were occasional reasons for going beyond the agreed- upon limit, it phrased its recommendation as: . Mc. Cabe called the measure he devised for this purpose essential complexity. This reduction corresponds to what a human would do if she extracted a subroutine from the larger piece of code. In contrast, if the program is not structured, the iterative process will identify the irreducible part. The essential complexity measure defined by Mc. Cabe is simply the cyclomatic complexity of this irreducible graph, so it will be precisely 1 for all structured programs, but greater than one for non- structured programs. Assuming each test case takes one path, the number of cases needed to achieve path coverage is equal to the number of paths that can actually be taken. But some paths may be impossible, so although the number of paths through the CFG is clearly an upper bound on the number of test cases needed for path coverage, this latter number (of possible paths) is sometimes less than M. All three of the above numbers may be equal: branch coverage . The exit has been connected to the entry to make the graph strongly connected. In this example, two test cases are sufficient to achieve a complete branch coverage, while four are necessary for complete path coverage. The cyclomatic complexity of the program is 3 (as the strongly connected graph for the program contains 9 edges, 7 nodes and 1 connected component) (9- 7+1). In general, in order to fully test a module all execution paths through the module should be exercised. This implies a module with a high complexity number requires more testing effort than a module with a lower value since the higher complexity number indicates more pathways through the code. This also implies that a module with higher complexity is more difficult for a programmer to understand since the programmer must understand the different pathways and the results of those pathways. Unfortunately, it is not always practical to test all possible paths through a program. Considering the example above, each time an additional if- then- else statement is added, the number of possible paths doubles. As the program grew in this fashion, it would quickly reach the point where testing all of the paths was impractical. One common testing strategy, espoused for example by the NIST Structured Testing methodology, is to use the cyclomatic complexity of a module to determine the number of white- box tests that are required to obtain sufficient coverage of the module. In almost all cases, according to such a methodology, a module should have at least as many tests as its cyclomatic complexity; in most cases, this number of tests is adequate to exercise all the relevant paths of the function. Branch coverage would allow us to test the method with just two tests, and one possible set of tests would be to test the following cases: c. Neither of these cases exposes the bug. If, however, we use cyclomatic complexity to indicate the number of tests we require, the number increases to 3. We must therefore test one of the following paths: c. Either of these tests will expose the bug. Cohesion. The possible correlation between higher complexity measure with a lower level of cohesion is predicated on a module with more decision points generally implementing more than a single well defined function. A 2. 00. 5 study showed stronger correlations between complexity metrics and an expert assessment of cohesion in the classes studied than the correlation between the expert's assessment and metrics designed to calculate cohesion. The essence of this observation is that larger programs (more complex programs as defined by Mc. Cabe's metric) tend to have more defects. Although this relation is probably true, it isn't commercially useful. Some researchers who have studied the area question the validity of the methods used by the studies finding no correlation..
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |